8 Comments
User's avatar
Jens Heycke's avatar

As you say, Ibn Saud deserves credit for denouncing Hajj Amin.

But, it is important to note that the House of Saud had already been tightly intertwined with the family and theology of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab for two hundred years by Ibn Saud's time. The Wahhabi grip on the family has not ended.

Wahhabi thinking derives from the 13th-century Hanbali extremist Ibn Taymiyyah. It advocates brutal persecution of anyone deemed apostate, including anyone guilty of "bid'ah"-- even small changes to Islam as it was practiced in the 7th century. It's also big on destroying anything that might possibly connected with idolatry -- not only Buddhist figures, but also tombs and cemeteries of early Islamic heroes. Even music is deemed "haram" (forbidden), with public concerts, music in the schools, and radio banned.

Expand full comment
d.w.'s avatar

Interesting; thanks for outlining that.

Expand full comment
Iconoclast's avatar

Looking forward to your book on the Mufti!

I still don’t understand why Britain appointed him in the first place and why they didn’t finda replacement in1939.

Expand full comment
Iconoclast's avatar

I would add to my previous comment, I assume the British did not attempt to develop an all-Palestine administration due to the difficulty of organizing any governing system that would balance the interests of Palestinian Arabs and Palestinian Jews.

Expand full comment
d.w.'s avatar

Invaluable piece; thanks for writing.

Expand full comment
GUSUN's avatar

For his people, Hajj Amin al-Husseini was a curse.

Expand full comment
Alan, aka DudeInMinnetonka's avatar

Did T.E. Lawrence have a relationship with him or the Mufti?

He was in with the king of Iraq iirc

Expand full comment
Jeremy Stewardson's avatar

Fascinating insights into the catastrophes this fanatic got his people into . Why the British ( and others ) didn’t kill this ogre when they could have , is a mystery .

Expand full comment